Follow Us

Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Regulation Securities Litigation White Collar Crime

Rule 10b-5 Liability: The Second Circuit and ‘Rio Tinto’

Part Three of a Three-Part Article

The first two installments exposited Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders and Lorenzo v. S.E.C., both essential to understanding S.E.C. v. Rio Tinto, the Second Circuit’s most recent holding regarding Rule 10b-5 “scheme” liability. Now we examine how the “Mother Court” of federal securities law has tended to that branch of the mighty judicial oak rooted in that venerable regulation.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

In the first two installments, I exposited Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders, 564 U.S. 135 (2011), and Lorenzo v. S.E.C., 587 U.S. ___, 139 S. Ct. 1094 (2019), respectively, both essential to understanding S.E.C. v. Rio Tinto PLC, 41 F.4th 47 (2d Cir. 2022), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s most recent holding regarding Rule 10b-5 “scheme” liability. See, 17 C.F.R. §240.10b-5.

This premium content is locked for Business Crimes Bulletin subscribers only

Continue reading by getting
started with a subscription.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS FOR WHITE-COLLAR CRIME AND REGULATORY PRACTITIONERS.
  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • All aspects of financial and white-collar crime are covered
  • Tap into expert guidance from top white-collar crime adn regulatory lawyers and experts

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Subscribe Now For Unlimited Access

Read These Next