Call 855-808-4530 or email Gro[email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The legal field has been inundated with various types of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology that have promised to revolutionize the industry. From document review to predictive analytics and decision-making tools, there is no shortage of AI tools available. The recent public debut of ChatGPT and GPT-4, while fueling excitement about the future of AI, has only added to the confusion to those of us in the legal industry, leaving many unsure of its implications for litigation and law practice in general. For definition purposes, “litigation” will encompass legal practices that involve the review of data or material information in responding to an internal or external investigation, and/or traditional civil or commercial litigation matters.
Continue reading by getting
started with a subscription.
New U.S.-China Investment Dynamic Focuses On AI and Sensitive Technologies
By David A. Holley
An Executive Order released by the Biden Administration on Aug. 9 places increased importance on due diligence when investing in specific foreign countries. The Executive Order will regulate outbound investments in China with a focus on key technologies critical to safeguarding U.S. national security, including artificial intelligence.
New York’s Latest Cybersecurity Commitment
By Erik B. Weinick
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York’s inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
Data Breach Defense: Mobilizing Against Weaponized Mass Arbitration
By Daniella Main and Brooke Bolender
Most companies have experienced or will experience a data breach. Increasingly, companies also face the risks associated with mass arbitration weaponized by the overwhelming volume of claims after a breach.
By Wim Nauwelaerts
Businesses and organizations that (regularly) transfer personal data from the EU to the U.S. should carefully assess, on a case-by-case basis, whether it makes sense to rely on the new EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework or to use one of the other data transfer tools that are available under the GDPR.