Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In a win for trademark holders, the U.S. Supreme Court offered a narrow ruling in the dispute involving “dog toys and whiskey.” Trademark-rights attorneys praised the Supreme Court’s justices for the decision in Jack Daniel’s Properties Inc v. VIP Products LLC, 22-148, which offered a rare mix of constitutional and trademark law, though easing for now the fears of content creators that refer to pre-existing marks.
Continue reading by getting
started with a subscription.
By Stan Soocher
A recent New York federal court decision in a dispute between a broker that sublicenses program content and a broadcaster that sublicensed content from the broker considered the interaction of contract language and extra-contractual elements of the parties’ relationship to determine whether a fiduciary relationship existed.
By Avalon Zoppo
In a move of keen interest to the entertainment industry, the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has agreed to review whether a judge’s denial of a motion to strike a California Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation suit can be immediately appealed by the defendant who claims the case was brought solely to chill its speech.
By Jonathan Moskin and Rachel Pauley
The emerging cases by authors and copyright owners challenging various generative AI programs for using copyrighted materials are certain to create new troubles for the courts being asked to apply the fair use doctrine to this important new technology.
By Entertainment Law & Finance Staff
Notable court filings in entertainment law.