Follow Us

Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Intellectual Property Regulation Trademarks

The Presumption of Irreparable Harm After the Trademark Modernization Act Of 2020: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

This article explores developments (both positive and negative) in the post-TMA world in which courts have wrestled with implementation of the presumption of irreparable harm in trademark cases.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

On Dec. 27, 2020, the Trademark Modernization Act of 2020 (TMA) became law. A key component of that legislation was the codification in Section 34(a) of the Lanham Act of the common-law principle that a trademark owner seeking injunctive relief in actions for trademark infringement and unfair competition under Sections 32 and 43 of the Lanham Act is entitled to a rebuttable presumption of irreparable harm. The presumption arises upon the movant demonstrating liability at the proof stage, or a showing of a likelihood of liability in the context of motions for expedited relief seeking a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction.

This premium content is locked for The Intellectual Property Strategist subscribers only

Continue reading by getting
started with a subscription.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PRACTITIONERS.
  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical analysis of developments in patent, copyright and trademark law
  • Tap into expert guidance from top intellectual property lawyers and experts

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Subscribe Now For Unlimited Access

Read These Next