Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
After over a year and a half at the helm of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Director Kathi Vidal has made significant and lasting impacts on the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) through a variety of different actions, including Director Reviews, issuing guidance, designating additional cases as precedential, issuing sanctions sua sponte, and returning institution rates to 2016 levels. All signs point to continuation of additional changes under her continued leadership, based on various proposed rulemaking announcements and the USPTO's current Strategic Plan.
Perhaps the largest impact that Director Vidal has had upon the PTAB is has been via Director Reviews. The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Arthrex, Inc., 141 S.Ct. 1970 (2021), mandated Director Reviews to correct what the case deemed procedural defects in the way that administrative patent judges are appointed to the PTAB. Although the interim Director Review procedure was put in place before Director Vidal was in office, prior to her tenure only five out of the 189 requests filed were granted, according to PTAB-published statistics. According to those same statistics, under Director Vidal a total of 41 Director Reviews have been issued as of this writing, with most being issued sua sponte by the Director and just a handful of them resulting from parties' requests for Director Review. Thus, Director Vidal has taken seriously the mandate of the Arthrex case and has been a very active in clarifying PTAB procedures and precedent via sua sponte Director Reviews.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.