Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Director Vidal's Impact On the PTAB: Big Changes and More On the Way
After over a year and a half at the helm of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Director Kathi Vidal has made significant and lasting impacts on the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) through a variety of different actions, including Director Reviews, issuing guidance, designating additional cases as precedential, issuing sanctions sua sponte, and returning institution rates to 2016 levels. All signs point to continuation of additional changes under her continued leadership, based on various proposed rulemaking announcements and the USPTO's current Strategic Plan.
Perhaps the largest impact that Director Vidal has had upon the PTAB is has been via Director Reviews. The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Arthrex, Inc., 141 S.Ct. 1970 (2021), mandated Director Reviews to correct what the case deemed procedural defects in the way that administrative patent judges are appointed to the PTAB. Although the interim Director Review procedure was put in place before Director Vidal was in office, prior to her tenure only five out of the 189 requests filed were granted, according to PTAB-published statistics. According to those same statistics, under Director Vidal a total of 41 Director Reviews have been issued as of this writing, with most being issued sua sponte by the Director and just a handful of them resulting from parties' requests for Director Review. Thus, Director Vidal has taken seriously the mandate of the Arthrex case and has been a very active in clarifying PTAB procedures and precedent via sua sponte Director Reviews.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.