Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Today, internal investigations have taken on added complexity given the government's current emphasis on voluntary disclosures, the increased vigor of social justice movements, the 24/7 news cycle, and other heightened risks that often require companies to respond quickly to an unexpected event or potential crisis. Further, employees, customers, business partners, shareholders, investors, and the public expect increased responsibility and accountability from companies. As a result, the ability to conduct an effective internal investigation and at the same time satisfactorily respond to different stakeholders, while also preserving privilege when appropriate, is more difficult and multi-faceted than ever before. To help companies navigate these complexities and best address such situations, the following strategies should be considered.
While it goes without saying that an investigative team needs to have the relevant subject matter expertise, the team also should be tailored to the allegations with care and consideration given to diversity of backgrounds and experiences. With an increased sensitivity to allegations of workplace misconduct, racial and sexual harassment, and even acts of violence, the investigative team should have members with the necessary experience and training to speak with victims of the type of conduct alleged and who can properly provide perspective and gain a witness's trust, as well as assuage concerns and fears. In addition, the investigative team should include members with relevant government service and experience to help navigate discussions with interested government agencies or other regulatory bodies.
The investigative team should adopt an investigative scope that is reasonably tailored and calculated to be prompt but thorough. At the onset, this assessment includes deciding who should be interviewed, the preferred format and order of interviews, and what documents need to be located, preserved, reviewed, and prioritized, as well as what information may be in the public domain that needs to be preserved, such as social media posts. The increasingly complicated issues surrounding obtaining employees' cellphone data and text messages, including data from ephemeral messaging apps, also need to assessed as early as possible. An added challenge arises when the investigation spans across borders, as there are a multitude of differing and often conflicting laws and rules that govern privilege, foreign data privacy, and labor and employment matters in certain jurisdictions. Last, but most important, the potential audience for the results of the internal investigation is key to determining scope, in particular, whether the results will be documented in a written report, whether they may be required to be disclosed to the government or in potential civil litigation, and/or whether the company may need to issue public findings, perhaps with remedial recommendations as well.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.