Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Following months of anticipation, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ) unveiled their new Merger Guidelines (the Guidelines) on Dec. 18, 2023. More than 30,000 stakeholders offered input on proposed changes to the Guidelines, which were previously updated in 2010. While the agencies made some modifications in response to public comment, the core elements of the final Guidelines are consistent with the draft version released in July 2023.
Promising sharper scrutiny of mergers and acquisitions, the new Guidelines formalize the Biden administration's interventionist approach to enforcement and represent the culmination of its efforts to revamp antitrust policy. Indeed, the theme of modernization pervaded the agencies' remarks upon release — FTC Chair Lina Khan declared that the Guidelines "reflect the new realities of how firms do business in the modern economy," while Attorney General Merrick Garland asserted that they protect Americans from "the ways in which unlawful, anticompetitive practices manifest themselves in our modern economy" (Press Release, Federal Trade Commission, "Federal Trade Commission and Justice Department Release 2023 Merger Guidelines" (Dec. 18, 2023)). From loosened structural presumptions to unconventional theories of harm such as "ecosystem competition" to consideration of a merger's effects on outside markets, we review some of the most noteworthy changes in the new Guidelines.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.