Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Although Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code allows existing management of a debtor to remain in control of its business, it imposes several oversight mechanisms to help ensure the integrity of the process. Two of the most common include the Office of the U.S. Trustee and an Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors. In addition, the code calls, under certain conditions, for the appointment of an independent examiner whose role can run from the very broad to extremely limited. Some courts interpret the code's examiner appointment provisions to be mandatory if the statutory requirements are met, while many others do not. The now infamous Chapter 11 bankruptcy case of FTX Trading Ltd. (FTX), once a multibillion-dollar cryptocurrency company, has reemerged in a dispute over this very important issue. On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently held that the plain text of Section 1104(c)(2) mandates the appointment of an examiner under the specified conditions set forth. See, In re FTX Trading, No. 23-2297, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 1279 (3d Cir. Jan. 19, 2024). As a result, in the Third Circuit, and likely other jurisdictions, the FTX decision will carry significant implications for large and medium-sized bankruptcy cases.
As background, Samuel Bankman-Fried (SBF) was the founder and majority owner of both FTX, a cryptocurrency exchange platform, and Alameda Research, a cryptocurrency hedge fund. Since its formation in 2019, FTX had grown to a staggering $32 billion valuation in just a few years. In early November 2022, however, questions emerged alleging a conflict of interest between the two ostensibly independent companies, and investors began cashing out at an alarming rate after discovering that Alameda Research had used funds from FTX customers to inflate its own balance sheet, among other questionable activities. On Nov. 11, 2022, following a massive liquidity crisis that saw customers collectively lose billions of dollars in investments and put the legitimacy of the entire cryptocurrency industry in question, FTX filed for bankruptcy and SBF appointed John J. Ray III as replacement CEO for FTX and its affiliates. Ray's own investigations of the company confirmed "unacceptable management practices" including "the use of software to conceal the misuse of customer funds," and ultimately "located and secured only a fraction of the digital assets."
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.