Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Although Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code allows existing management of a debtor to remain in control of its business, it imposes several oversight mechanisms to help ensure the integrity of the process. Two of the most common include the Office of the U.S. Trustee and an Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors. In addition, the code calls, under certain conditions, for the appointment of an independent examiner whose role can run from the very broad to extremely limited. Some courts interpret the code's examiner appointment provisions to be mandatory if the statutory requirements are met, while many others do not. The now infamous Chapter 11 bankruptcy case of FTX Trading Ltd. (FTX), once a multibillion-dollar cryptocurrency company, has reemerged in a dispute over this very important issue. On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently held that the plain text of Section 1104(c)(2) mandates the appointment of an examiner under the specified conditions set forth. See, In re FTX Trading, No. 23-2297, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 1279 (3d Cir. Jan. 19, 2024). As a result, in the Third Circuit, and likely other jurisdictions, the FTX decision will carry significant implications for large and medium-sized bankruptcy cases.
As background, Samuel Bankman-Fried (SBF) was the founder and majority owner of both FTX, a cryptocurrency exchange platform, and Alameda Research, a cryptocurrency hedge fund. Since its formation in 2019, FTX had grown to a staggering $32 billion valuation in just a few years. In early November 2022, however, questions emerged alleging a conflict of interest between the two ostensibly independent companies, and investors began cashing out at an alarming rate after discovering that Alameda Research had used funds from FTX customers to inflate its own balance sheet, among other questionable activities. On Nov. 11, 2022, following a massive liquidity crisis that saw customers collectively lose billions of dollars in investments and put the legitimacy of the entire cryptocurrency industry in question, FTX filed for bankruptcy and SBF appointed John J. Ray III as replacement CEO for FTX and its affiliates. Ray's own investigations of the company confirmed "unacceptable management practices" including "the use of software to conceal the misuse of customer funds," and ultimately "located and secured only a fraction of the digital assets."
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.