Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
At a recent social event I attended, I met a lawyer — let's call him Mark. When Mark heard that I run a content marketing agency focusing on legal services, he chuckled and said, "I bet you run into a lot of lawyers who think they know how to do marketing better than you do." Before I could assure him that this was rarely a problem and that I very much enjoyed working with lawyers and law firms, Mark leaned in close to tell me that, in his opinion, "most law firms are doing it wrong" and "should be focusing on business development rather than marketing." After imparting this piece of wisdom, he sat back with a satisfied smile.
As ironic as the scenario might have been, Mark's suggestion started me thinking.
The idea that marketing and business development are separate, siloed functions, or that they exist in an either-or relationship with each other, is not an uncommon one, especially for lawyers who may only get an occasional peek into what their firm's marketing and business development professionals spend their days working on. Understanding how marketing and business development work together can also be challenging in part because these two functions tend not to have simple definitions or clear-cut scopes, in either general business parlance or legal services marketing.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?