Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Having a crisis communications and mitigation strategy in place is essential for law firms and businesses of all sizes to be prepared for unexpected situations that could jeopardize their reputation. Think of it like insurance — you hope you never have to use it but are relieved to have it when you need it. In crafting this strategy, companies need to weigh various factors such as the nature of the crisis, the values and expectations of their stakeholders, and the potential impact on their reputation. These considerations will guide the decision on whether to take the traditional route of apologizing and making amends or to embrace the escalation strategy, which is standing firm on the company's values despite the potential backlash.
In traditional public relations 101, the classic method of crisis communications has been to maintain neutrality while demonstrating the three Rs: Recognize the mistake, show Remorse, and act swiftly to Resolve. However, as the dynamics of social media and stakeholder expectations have shifted, there is a growing debate on whether taking a solid position, even at the risk of backlash, can be more effective in building a lasting law firm brand legacy.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.