Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When suspicions of wrongdoing or illegal activity have arisen in your organization, an internal investigation should be considered to minimize damage to the organization's reputation and to limit the organization's exposure to criminal, civil and regulatory enforcement, and related action.
An internal investigation should be considered when there is a credible indication that a law or an important organizational policy has been violated within the global organization. The alleged misconduct may be at the parent or subsidiary level. Regardless of whether the allegation is at the parent or the subsidiary level, the organization has an obligation to investigate the allegation and remedy the situation promptly. What steps should the organization take to investigate the conduct? It is prudent that internal investigations regarding serious allegations should be conducted by external counsel that is not engaged as counsel for the parent or the subsidiary for other representation. Independence is the key.
It presents a significant challenge when the parent is a foreign company, and the conduct is alleged to have occurred at a United States subsidiary. What criteria should the foreign parent organization use to select counsel in the United States to conduct the independent internal investigation? These issues will be discussed in this article.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.