Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Automation is transforming industries across the board, and the legal sector is no exception. In the realm of e-discovery, automation is revolutionizing how legal teams manage their workflows. This article explores how automation impacts critical workflows for legal teams in e-discovery and provides valuable use cases and actionable tips to ensure that your e-discovery processes are positively impacted by automation.
Automation in e-discovery refers to the use of software and technology to perform tasks that traditionally required manual intervention. This includes everything from identifying relevant documents, to preserving data, to conducting document review. With the increasing volume of electronically stored information (ESI) held by organizations today, automation is not just beneficial. It is essential for legal teams.
Repeatability
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
End of year collections are crucial for law firms because they allow them to maximize their revenue for the year, impacting profitability, partner distributions and bonus calculations by ensuring outstanding invoices are paid before the year closes, which is especially important for meeting financial targets and managing cash flow throughout the firm.
Law firms and companies in the professional services space must recognize that clients are conducting extensive online research before making contact. Prospective buyers are no longer waiting for meetings with partners or business development professionals to understand the firm's offerings. Instead, they are seeking out information on their own, and they want to do it quickly and efficiently.
Through a balanced approach that combines incentives with accountability, firms can navigate the complexities of returning to the office while maintaining productivity and morale.
The paradigm of legal administrative support within law firms has undergone a remarkable transformation over the last decade. But this begs the question: are the changes to administrative support successful, and do law firms feel they are sufficiently prepared to meet future business needs?
Counsel should include in its analysis of a case the taxability of the anticipated and sought after damages as the tax effect could be substantial.