Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Limited Warranty Establishes Defense to Consequential Damages Claim Against Sponsor
Board of Managers of the 37, 39 Madison Street Condominium v. 31 Madison Street Development, LLC 2024 WL 4219497 AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In an action by a condominium board against the sponsor and its principals seeking damages for defective construction, the sponsor appealed from Supreme Court’s denial of the branch of its motion seek dismissal of claims for consequential damages, unjust enrichment, negligence, and breach of an implied housing merchant warranty. The Appellate Division modified to grant the motion, relying on language in the purchase agreements.
The purchase agreements between sponsor and the condominium unit owners provide that the sponsor’s limited warranty “excludes all consequential, incidental, special damages and indirect damages.” The board of managers of the 12-unit condominium brought an action for defective construction of some of the condominium’s common areas, asserting claims for breach of contract, negligence, unjust enrichment, and breach of an implied housing merchant warranty. Sponsor moved to dismiss, and Supreme Court denied the motion.
In modifying, the Appellate Division held that documentary evidence — the limited warranty — conclusively established a defense to the consequential damages claim. The court went on to hold that the purchase agreements and limited warranty also precluded the condominium’s other claims.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.