Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Limited Warranty Establishes Defense to Consequential Damages Claim Against Sponsor
Board of Managers of the 37, 39 Madison Street Condominium v. 31 Madison Street Development, LLC 2024 WL 4219497 AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In an action by a condominium board against the sponsor and its principals seeking damages for defective construction, the sponsor appealed from Supreme Court’s denial of the branch of its motion seek dismissal of claims for consequential damages, unjust enrichment, negligence, and breach of an implied housing merchant warranty. The Appellate Division modified to grant the motion, relying on language in the purchase agreements.
The purchase agreements between sponsor and the condominium unit owners provide that the sponsor’s limited warranty “excludes all consequential, incidental, special damages and indirect damages.” The board of managers of the 12-unit condominium brought an action for defective construction of some of the condominium’s common areas, asserting claims for breach of contract, negligence, unjust enrichment, and breach of an implied housing merchant warranty. Sponsor moved to dismiss, and Supreme Court denied the motion.
In modifying, the Appellate Division held that documentary evidence — the limited warranty — conclusively established a defense to the consequential damages claim. The court went on to hold that the purchase agreements and limited warranty also precluded the condominium’s other claims.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.