Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Development

By New York Real Estate Law Reporter Staff
December 01, 2024

Department of Environmental Conservation Misapplied Statute
Matter of Town of Southampton v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
2024 WL4549139
AppDiv, Second Dept.
(memorandum opinion)
In a town’s article 78 proceeding to review the Department of Environmental Conservation’s grant of a permit to expand a prior nonconforming mining use, the town appealed from Supreme Court’s denial of the petition and dismissal of the proceeding. The Appellate Division reversed and annulled the permit, holding that the Department had misapplied Environmental Conservation Law 23-2703(3).
Operator of a sand and gravel mine applied to the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) to expand the breadth and depth of its mining operation in Suffolk County. In response to a request from DEC, the town supervisor stated that mining was not a permitted use within any zoning category in the town. DEC nevertheless issued a permit for expanded mining pursuant to the general rule that an owner is entitled to expand a quarrying operation as a nonconforming use if the owner has engaged in quarrying operations for a long period and has manifested an intention to appropriate the entire parcel for quarrying. When the town challenged the determination, Supreme Court denied the petition.
In reversing, the Appellate Division relied on Environmental Conservation Law 23-2703(3), which prohibits consideration of a mining permit within counties with populations of one million or more that draw their drinking water from a sole source aquifer if local zoning laws prohibit mining uses. Suffolk County qualifies under the statute. The court also relied on the recent Court of Appeals decision in Town of Southampton v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, 39 NY3d 201, which indicated that the statute protects against expansion of mining activities beyond the permissible nonconforming use.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Judge Rules Shaquille O'Neal Will Face Securities Lawsuit for Promotion, Sale of NFTs Image

A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.

Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners Image

Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.

Coverage Issues Stemming from Dry Cleaner Contamination Suits Image

In recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be "organic," "green," or "eco-friendly." While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical.