Questions of Fact About Compliance With Mortgage Contingency Clause
Berger v. Mazzarone2024 WL 4498173
AppDiv, Second Dept.
(memorandum opinion)
In buyer’s action to recover a down payment, buyer appealed from Supreme Court’s grant of summary judgment to seller. The Appellate Division reversed, holding that questions of fact remained about buyer’s compliance with the mortgage contingency clause in the sale contract.
This premium content is locked for New York Real Estate Law Reporter subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN New York Real Estate Law Reporter
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.