Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A recent AI copyright ruling out of federal court could have a sprawling impact on how companies, both big and small, use the technology responsibly, according to experts. In the ruling, Third Circuit appellate Judge Stephanos Bibas, sitting by designation in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, found that tech startup ROSS Intelligence infringed on 2,443 case-decisions headnotes in Thomson’ proprietary legal database Westlaw.
The opinion found that ROSS’s use of the copyrighted content, obtained through LegalEase Solutions, was commercial, not transformative, and could not constitute fair use. Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH v. ROSS Intelligence Inc., 1:20-cv-613.
“There is nothing that Thomson Reuters created that ROSS could not have created for itself or hired LegalEase to create for it without infringing Thomson Reuters’ copyrights,” Judge Bibas wrote.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.