Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
It’s common knowledge that most sports figures have a coach. But what about surgeons? How about CEOs of major corporations? Boston surgeon Atul Gawande wrote The Checklist Manifesto, in which he explains the value of coaching to improve a surgeon’s skill and reduce overall hospital error rates. In CEO Excellence: The Six Mindsets That Distinguish the Best Leaders From the Rest by Carolyn Dewar, Scott Keller, and Vikram Malhotra, the authors emphasize that coaching can support CEOs in navigating complex challenges and driving organizational success. I point this out to say that coaching can be transformative for your underperforming partners.
Whether an athlete or a professional, the goal of coaching is always to improve performance. One-on-one coaching is a highly personalized activity focused on the specific needs of the individual. Great athletes use coaches even though they are at the top of their game. Coaching can make anyone better at whatever it is they want to improve. Part of my coaching practice focuses on the opposite end of the spectrum. I enjoy helping underperforming partners turn their practices around.
When I work with an underperforming attorney, I start by asking them, “why are we here?” Just like an individual with other concerns, the person needs to be able to accept and articulate that they have a problem or issue that needs to be addressed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.