Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
It’s rare that a day goes by without news of the impact artificial intelligence (AI) is having on our lives, for better or worse. While AI has many proven beneficial applications, outside my expertise, there is a concerning trend emerging in my field. As someone who has built my career creating and protecting brand equity, I’ve witnessed an increasing number of disputes that are based on mimicry of distinctive brand identities without permission. Traditional trademark protection cases now share courtrooms with proceedings based in the digital realm, dramatically changing both the playing field and the rules in brand infringement cases. As a branding professional who has seen my share of industry evolution over the years, it is something that I have been asked to weigh in on with more and more frequency.
To understand AI’s influence on brand infringement, one must go back to what I refer to as Branding 101. Historically, brands earned status by making or doing something that was relevantly different and more effective than the competition. It might be a formula to make clothes cleaner, teeth whiter, insurance cheaper, cars more fuel efficient, or to relieve headaches faster. When litigation arose, supporting rational claims was relatively straightforward, typically involving one brand infringing on another’s product, R&D practices, or marketing tactics.
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.