Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Social media is going through its teenage years. Moody, unpredictable, deeply self-aware — yet brimming with potential.
If you’ve been online over the past decade, you’ve witnessed the rise and plateau of the social media monoculture: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, rinse, repeat. We built our brands, businesses, and personal identities around these platforms, watching as they dictated what connection, conversation and community were supposed to look like.
But lately, something fascinating has happened.
In a recent New Yorker article, tech writer Kyle Chayka makes the case that social media is finally “getting better by falling apart.” That sounds counterintuitive — until you remember that adolescence is a necessary detour on the way to adulthood. It’s chaotic, yes. But it’s also where reinvention begins.
Post-pandemic, users began to break away from the centralized giants. The cultural dominance of a few platforms has been eroded by TikTok’s hyper-personalized algorithm, the rise of Discord’s intimate group chats, the resurgence of Reddit’s human-first content, and the hopeful, if clunky, emergence of decentralized networks like Bluesky. Meanwhile, X (formerly Twitter) has spun itself into irrelevance under Elon Musk’s erratic stewardship. Meta, for all its capital, is chasing virality over authenticity — and it shows.
What we’re seeing is the slow death of the feed and the rebirth of the forum. Social media is becoming less about broadcasting to the masses and more about connecting within context. That’s a good thing.
For businesses and law firms, this moment is an invitation — not an identity crisis. It’s a chance to reassess how we show up. Are we still chasing metrics that no longer matter? Are we showing up where our audiences actually are, or just where they used to be? Are we broadcasting or connecting? Just like teens redefining themselves, platforms are being reshaped by their users — not the other way around. Bluesky, for instance, is designed to let users take their data and social graph with them. It's portable, people-powered, and intentionally anti-monopoly. Think of it as the open-source alternative to the walled gardens we’ve grown too comfortable in.
As a PR and social media professional, I believe the next evolution will reward brands and firms that are brave enough to ditch the old playbook. The ones that embrace storytelling, community-building, and authenticity — not just aesthetics and algorithms.
The future of social media might look less like a performance and more like a conversation. Less Zuckerberg, more Zoom room. Less broadcast, more belonging.
In other words: it’s growing up.
And just like your awkward teenage years, you’ll look back one day and realize this was the moment everything started to change — for the better.
*****
Julie Talenfeld is the founder and CEO of Boardroom PR. Contact her at [email protected].
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.