Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Importance of Change Management In Law Firms: Winning Lawyers' Support for Behavioral Change
As a former Chief Marketing Officer and now an advisor to law firms at 742 Advisors, I’ve witnessed firsthand the challenges of implementing meaningful change in legal organizations. Even the most innovative ideas can fall flat if attorneys aren't on board. Without champions driving initiatives forward, progress stalls, other fires burn brighter, and opportunities are lost.
Law firms, based on precedent, steeped in tradition, and historically resistant to disruption, often struggle with change management. Yet, in today’s rapidly evolving legal landscape, adapting to new technologies, processes and client expectations is no longer optional — it’s essential for survival. But change management is critical to stay competitive and thrive in an increasingly shifting marketplace.
Why Change Management Matters In Law Firms
The legal profession is uniquely resistant to change due to its deeply ingrained culture of precedent and risk aversion. Research from CARET Legal indicates that only 38% of people enjoy stepping out of their comfort zones, while the remaining 62% prefer to avoid it — a tendency amplified in law firms where tradition dominates decision-making. Moreover, according to a Harvard Law study, 47% of law firms cite "organizational issues," such as cultural resistance and lack of strategy, as top barriers to internal change.
However, the need for adaptation is undeniable, as noted:
- Client Demands: Clients are increasingly bringing legal work in-house (33%), seeking better control over costs and outcomes (BigHand). Firms that fail to adapt risk losing business.
- Attrition Risks: High levels of attrition persist across the legal sector — 69% of firms report increased or steady attrition rates over the past year (BigHand).
- Technology Disruption: Digital transformation is reshaping how legal services are delivered. Firms that embrace technology gain efficiency and competitive advantages, while those that resist risk obsolescence (CARET Legal).
Whether it’s adopting new technologies or rethinking workflows, successful change management requires a structured approach that aligns strategy with execution while addressing attorneys' concerns.
Four Strategies to Secure Attorney Buy-In
1. Leverage Data to Build a Compelling Case
Lawyers are trained to rely on evidence and logic. Use data-driven insights to demonstrate the necessity and potential benefits of change. For example, BigHand research notes that:
- Highlight inefficiencies: Research shows that 12% of lawyers spend over five non-billable hours per week on administrative tasks that should be delegated — equating to 23,000 lost billable hours annually for a firm with 100 lawyers.
- Showcase ROI: Firms using resource management tools report improved efficiency and profitability by aligning lawyer expertise with client needs.
- Benchmark against competitors: Present data on how similar firms have successfully adopted new systems or processes to gain a competitive edge.
Presenting concrete data helps firms build a compelling case for change that resonates with attorneys.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.