Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Co-ops and Condominiums
Co-Op Entitled to Withhold Consent to Sublet
Orlitsky v. 33 Greenwich Owners Corp.2025 WL 676701
AppDiv, First Dept.
(memorandum opinion)
In co-op shareholder’s action against the co-op corporation, the parties cross-appealed from Supreme Court’s order denying the co-op’s motion to dismiss the causes of action for trespass, breach of the proprietary lease, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and breach of fiduciary duty, but granting the co-op’s motion to dismiss the claims for breach of the implied warranty of habitability and tortious interference with contract. The Appellate Division modified to dismiss the causes of action for breach of the proprietary lease, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment, and otherwise affirmed, holding that discovery was necessary to evaluate shareholder’s trespass and breach of fiduciary duty claims.
The co-op corporation sent a letter to shareholder informing him that he would no longer be permitted to sublet his apartment. The complaint also alleged that after a gas line repair, the cop-op’s agents entered shareholder’s apartment without permission or justification. These actions prompted shareholder’s action.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Warehouse Liability: Know Before You Stow!
As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?