Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced on May 12, 2025, a strategy shift in its approach to white collar enforcement, identifying specific high-impact areas of focus; an expansion of whistleblower and self-disclosure incentives; and a narrowed use of corporate monitorships. These strategic shifts present significant opportunities for companies and individuals currently facing government investigations, particularly where those investigations no longer align with DOJ priorities.
In its announcement, the DOJ unveiled its new white collar enforcement plan, which prioritizes the investigation and prosecution of crimes that pose direct risks to public safety, national security, and economic stability. Consistent with its “America First” approach that seeks to root out waste, fraud, and abuse that harms the public funds the DOJ identified categories for what it considers to be “high-impact areas” that will remain or become DOJ priorities. Specifically, the 10 “high-impact areas” enumerated are:
While these include some traditional DOJ focuses, such as health care and government procurement fraud, money laundering, and market manipulation, it now also contains areas aligned with the policy agenda of the current administration, such as trade and customs fraud, tariff evasion, and fraud committed by or for the purposes of funding foreign terrorist organizations and transnational criminal cartels.
In particular, the DOJ now emphasizes the growing threat of Chinese money laundering organizations and the use of laundered funds in the manufacturing and distribution of illegal drugs, such as fentanyl. Prosecutors are instructed to prioritize schemes involving senior-level personnel or other culpable actors, demonstrable loss, and efforts to obstruct justice, and to seize assets that are proceeds of high-impact offenses.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?