Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Change isn’t coming — it’s already here. In nearly every corner of business, and particularly in the legal industry, the pace of innovation is accelerating. Marketing and public relations professionals in law firms or those targeting legal clients are standing at a critical crossroads: either resist the wave of change or ride it forward with purpose, agility and creativity.
The legal profession is built on precedent, precision and caution — values that serve the practice of law well. But for legal marketers, these same traits can create friction when innovation is needed. The challenge? Finding the balance between tradition and transformation.
The landscape of marketing has shifted dramatically over the last decade, and legal marketing is no exception. A field once dominated by print brochures, in-person networking events and earned media now includes marketing automation platforms, content-rich digital campaigns, targeted email journeys and SEO-optimized thought leadership. And now artificial intelligence is reshaping how we write, segment audiences, generate insights and communicate value.
Still, the fundamental goals remain: visibility, credibility and client engagement. All that’s changed is how we achieve them.
Yet many law firms are still grappling with questions like:
In the legal world, risk aversion is a cultural constant. Lawyers are trained to mitigate liability and minimize uncertainty, and that mindset often extends to firm management, including marketing decisions. New platforms, bold creative concepts or emerging channels like podcasts or video can feel too experimental.
The fix: Marketers need to meet this mindset with a strategy rooted in data and clear outcomes. For instance, use A/B testing and small pilot campaigns to demonstrate how a new approach performs before full-scale implementation. Build trust incrementally. Share competitor benchmarks. Highlight how peers in the industry are embracing new channels without compromising integrity.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?