Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Embracing Change In Legal Marketing: A Call to Adapt and Lead
Change isn’t coming — it’s already here. In nearly every corner of business, and particularly in the legal industry, the pace of innovation is accelerating. Marketing and public relations professionals in law firms or those targeting legal clients are standing at a critical crossroads: either resist the wave of change or ride it forward with purpose, agility and creativity.
The legal profession is built on precedent, precision and caution — values that serve the practice of law well. But for legal marketers, these same traits can create friction when innovation is needed. The challenge? Finding the balance between tradition and transformation.
The Change Imperative
The landscape of marketing has shifted dramatically over the last decade, and legal marketing is no exception. A field once dominated by print brochures, in-person networking events and earned media now includes marketing automation platforms, content-rich digital campaigns, targeted email journeys and SEO-optimized thought leadership. And now artificial intelligence is reshaping how we write, segment audiences, generate insights and communicate value.
Still, the fundamental goals remain: visibility, credibility and client engagement. All that’s changed is how we achieve them.
Yet many law firms are still grappling with questions like:
- How do we implement new technologies without disrupting firm culture?
- How do we bring skeptical attorneys on board with marketing innovation?
- How do we maintain trust and authenticity in a digital-first world?
Pain Point: Risk Aversion
In the legal world, risk aversion is a cultural constant. Lawyers are trained to mitigate liability and minimize uncertainty, and that mindset often extends to firm management, including marketing decisions. New platforms, bold creative concepts or emerging channels like podcasts or video can feel too experimental.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.