Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Credit: Nuthawut/Adobe Stock
On July 8, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) and the USPS Office of Inspector General (USPS OIG) entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) creating a whistleblower rewards program “to enable whistleblowers to report specific, credible and timely information about possible federal criminal violations.” The first of its kind, it creates a monetary incentive for whistleblowers to report criminal antitrust violations involving such conduct as price fixing, bid rigging, market allocation and even certain types of predatory conduct by monopolists. The program supplements the DOJ Antitrust Leniency Policy and the Antitrust Criminal Penalty Enhancement and Reform Act (ACPERA). While those other programs offer the prospect of amnesty and limited civil liability for certain corporations and persons who have engaged in anticompetitive conduct, the whistleblower rewards program is designed to encourage anyone with information about antitrust violations to report them — and perhaps get paid in the process.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.