It's time to stop the hype, stop talking up AI as if it's the next best thing since sliced bread and prove that it's a useful tool and technology that can actually be used in the actual practice of law.
- March 01, 2024Brett Burney and Steve Salkin
The DOJ is likely to face many practical challenges and novel issues as it begins coding its own algorithm for AI-related enforcement. This article briefly examines three areas of AI-related enforcement where such practical challenges and novel issues may arise.
March 01, 2024James D. Gatta, Allan J. Medina and Ian Q. RogersThe cybersecurity landscape is on the brink of a transformative shift, with predictive analytics and behavioral analysis leading the charge for more resilient and adaptive defenses.
March 01, 2024Roy HadleyThe possibilities for patenting innovative applications of multimodal models across industries are endless.
March 01, 2024Matthew R. CareyHackers are using AI to sift large digital data to identify more convincing approaches for their scams as well as weaknesses in weaknesses in software coding or network security.
March 01, 2024Scott WarrenThe ultimate guardian of the quality of client service is the partners' own judgement but properly utilizing AI can set expectations that will benefit the clients and the firm and end forever the "End of the Billable Hour" stories.
March 01, 2024J. Mark SantiagoJust like any new technology, efforts to protect and enforce intellectual property on AI-based technologies are likely to be hampered by a lack of both a unified governing framework and a common understanding of the technology.
March 01, 2024Ed Lanquist, Jr. and Dominic RotaGenerative AI, combined with client education, could signal the slow death knell of the billable hour.
March 01, 2024Isha MaratheThe emerging cases by authors and copyright owners challenging various generative AI programs for using copyrighted materials are certain to create new troubles for the courts being asked to apply the fair use doctrine to this important new technology.
February 01, 2024Jonathan Moskin and Rachel PauleyAt what point does a "smart" computing system, or advanced software program, qualify as AI in the eyes of pertinent regulatory or judicial authorities? When is an individual considered to have merely deployed an AI-based computing tool to assist with creating a work of art or conceiving of a technological innovation? Each of these questions is explored in this article, giving consideration to currently prevailing guidelines from administrative bodies and the courts.
February 01, 2024Ed Lanquist, Jr. and Dominic Rota











