Detailed discussion involving two rulings of importance.
December 01, 2016ljnstaff | Law Journal NewslettersOnce Suffolk County pays a landowner to acquire Pineland Development Rights, can the county give some of those rights back to the landowner, without even requiring the landowner to pay for them?
November 01, 2016Stewart E. SterkQuestions of Fact Preclude Summary Judgment in Co-op Shareholder's Water Damages Action
November 01, 2016ssalkin | Law Journal NewslettersNo Statute of Limitations Applies to Forgery Claim
Mortgage Reformed for Mutual Mistake
Error in Setting Upset Price Does Not Provide Adequate Basis for Setting Aside Foreclosure Sale
Laches Bars Claim for Reformation of Mortgage
Questions of Fact Preclude Summary Judgment in Assertion of Forgery
Grantor's Action to Set Aside His Own Quitclaim Deed
No Summary Judgment in Dispute Between Cotenants
Homeowners Association Properly Exercised First Refusal RightNovember 01, 2016ssalkin | Law Journal NewslettersIssues can arise in the context of additional rent reconciliations that occur pursuant to the provisions of a commercial lease. We examine herein specific concerns from both landlord and tenant perspectives relating to over- and under-payments of rent, improper charges, supporting documentation and auditing procedures, as well as potential bars to claiming recoveries.
Part One of a Two-Part Article
November 01, 2016Lydia Pilch and Josh RosenAlthough the concept has been very successful in the retail industry, a collection of tenants serving food and beverages in one location presents several issues and problems for both landlords and tenants. Those issues suggest certain aspects of food-court tenancy that should be discussed and addressed during lease negotiations, so that both landlords and tenants end up receiving what they expect to receive from the food court experience.
November 01, 2016Glenn A. Browne
This button clears the current text from the Search Input field. Submit your search query.
