Leases keep getting longer and tougher. Unfortunately, sometimes the people drafting them outsmart themselves and include unenforceable provisions.
- October 30, 2006Jack Garson
Rulings of importance to you and your practice.
October 30, 2006ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |The latest cases for your review.
October 30, 2006ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |Accounting-Malpractice Claim/Arbitration
Contributory and Vicarious Copyright Infringement/Interlocutory Appeal
Copyright Infringement/Substantial Similarity
Copyright-Infringement Filing/Bankruptcy PurchaseOctober 30, 2006ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |Recent court rulings in e-discovery.
October 30, 2006ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |With state laws governing the capture and securing of evidence ' including electronic data ' the possibility of spoliation is a genuine concern. Not only could evidence subjected to spoliation be inadmissible, but misdemeanor or felony charges could apply to the collector and the contracting party.
Identifying electronic evidence, much like in a physical crime scene, starts with drawing increasing concentric circles around the victim or perpetrator. Some care must be taken regarding a company's policies and practices. State and federal law on personal property may be involved if the employee used personal devices legally or illegally in combination with the company's assets, and a warrant or commencement of discovery may be required to access personal property or equipment on private property.October 30, 2006Jason ParkHighlights of the latest equipment leasing news from around the country.
October 30, 2006ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |In reviewing KSR Int'l v. Teleflex, Inc. (No. 04-1350), the Supreme Court is set to tackle one of the fundamental issues of patentability ' the standard for obviousness under 35 U.S.C. '103. As expected, this case has generated significant interest and numerous amicus briefs have been filed. With oral argument expected to be heard late this month, this case marks the first time in 30 years that the Court will examine this particular issue.
October 30, 2006Steven S. Yu, M.D.

