Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Columns & Departments

In the Courts Image

In the Courts

ljnstaff

Analysis of a case in which a utility company was convicted for regulatory violations based on corporate collective knowledge .

Features

Recent Developments in the Responsible Corporate Office Doctrine Image

Recent Developments in the Responsible Corporate Office Doctrine

Joseph F. Savage, Jr. & Kate E. MacLeman

Until recently, the typical FDCA case has involved an executive who pleaded guilty to one or more misdemeanors in the face of DOJ allegations of felony misconduct. But until the Supreme Court clarifies the bounds of the FDCA, district courts will struggle with identifying the necessary elements of individual criminal liability.

Features

Jeter Endorsement Dispute Examines Role As a Director of Apparel Company Image

Jeter Endorsement Dispute Examines Role As a Director of Apparel Company

Richard Birns, Benyamin Ross & Andria Montoya

Contracts between a corporation and a corporate director can give rise to certain difficulties in managing expectations of the director's obligations and responsibilities. Such contracts may create obligations that extend beyond those fiduciary duties inherent to the director position. This extension of the director's role may increase the risk of a conflict between a director's contractual obligations and his fiduciary duties.

Features

Beats Headphones Royalty Dispute Saga Heads to Trial Image

Beats Headphones Royalty Dispute Saga Heads to Trial

Amanda Bronstad

Former hedge fund manager Steven Lamar, who helped launch Dr. Dre's Beats headphones a decade ago, won the right to go to trial against the rap artist and record producer after the California Court of Appeal revived his $100 million case over unpaid royalties.

Features

The New FCPA Cooperation Plan Image

The New FCPA Cooperation Plan

E. Fredrick Preis, Jr. & Rachael Jeanfreau

The DOL recently issued its final overtime rule revamping the white collar exemptions under the Fair Labor Standards Act for executive, administrative, professional, and highly compensated employees. This Final Rule, effective Dec. 1, 2016, rolls out major changes for employers.

Features

WB's Takedown Notices Aimed at Entertainment Co.'s Own Websites Image

WB's Takedown Notices Aimed at Entertainment Co.'s Own Websites

Jennifer Williams-Alvarez

Critics of the DMCA got some ammunition recently, when Warner Bros. asked Google to take down hundreds of copyright-infringing websites ' only to later realize that it had included legitimate sites and some of the entertainment company's own official pages. The blunder dredges up questions about whether the current notice-and-takedown system is working for both copyright owners and service providers.

Features

Supreme Court Term Promises to Be IP Blockbuster Image

Supreme Court Term Promises to Be IP Blockbuster

Scott Graham

With four IP cases on the docket and several more knocking at the door of certiorari, the U.S. Supreme Court is poised for a banner year of patent, trademark and copyright decisions.

Features

Courts Address When an Alleged Employee Hacking Is a Crime Image

Courts Address When an Alleged Employee Hacking Is a Crime

Richard Raysman & Peter Brown

Results have been mixed for employees accused of hacking into the databases of their own companies, competitors and potential business partners. This article discusses three recent cases in this area of law.

Features

Why Cybersecurity Is an Important Employment Law Issue Image

Why Cybersecurity Is an Important Employment Law Issue

Craig Nazzaro & Tracy Weir

The case described herein involved misuse of confidential information by present and former employees. Although this case involved mortgage companies, the lessons learned are valuable to any business.

Features

<b><i>Commentary:</i></b> Recent LGBTQ Laws Have Broader Effect on All Workers Image

<b><i>Commentary:</i></b> Recent LGBTQ Laws Have Broader Effect on All Workers

Angela D. Giampolo

Commentary: The 14th Amendment promises equal protection under the law, meaning that governments can't single out and punish groups of people for no reason. But the U.S. Supreme Court has been consistently vague about what that means for LGBTQ people. That may change soon.

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel
    'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.
    Read More ›
  • Divorce Lawyers' Obligation to Children
    Do divorce lawyers have an obligation to disclose client confidences when it is in the best interests of the client's child to do so? The short answer of the rules of professional responsibility is 'no' because a 'yes' answer is deemed to be fundamentally inconsistent with the premises of the adversary system in which the divorce lawyer functions. The longer answer is that the rules encourage ' but do not require ' a divorce lawyer to counsel the client to authorize the disclosure because it is in the best interests of both parent and child.
    Read More ›
  • Upping the Legal Training Ante
    Womble Carlyle's technology training and online learning programs were in need of an upgrade. Unprecedented firm growth, heightened emphasis on developing lawyers' core technology competencies, and a need to streamline and automate existing e-learning processes led the firm to initiate a fundamental shift.
    Read More ›