Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Features

Practice Tip: The Rule Against (Liability in) Perpetuity Image

Practice Tip: The Rule Against (Liability in) Perpetuity

Sean Simmons & Brad Strickland

Given the contrary positions taken by the Fourth, Fifth, and Ninth Circuit Courts of Appeal regarding the interpretation of CERCLA ' 9658, the Supreme Court's grant of certiorari in <I>Waldburger</I> is not only timely, but essential to providing manufacturers protection from stale claims ...

Features

Parallel Criminal Investigations Image

Parallel Criminal Investigations

Jonathan B. New, Brian F. Allen

As we saw last month, companies engaged in civil litigation that are also targets of related criminal investigations may find that confidential materials produced during civil discovery could become subject to subpoena in the criminal matter, even if they would normally have been outside the government's reach. We conclude our discussion herein.

Features

The New Math Image

The New Math

Stephanie Vasconcellos

The employer mandate under the ACA, which requires large employers to provide health insurance for their full-time employees or pay a penalty, is set to take effect on Jan. 1, 2015. Regulations released by the IRS set forth the final rules that an employer must use to determine whether it is a large employer subject to the mandate. With just over six months to go, the time is ripe for employers to determine whether they will be considered large employers and if so, to determine appropriate next steps.

Features

<i>Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. Natco Pharma Ltd. </i> Image

<i>Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. Natco Pharma Ltd. </i>

Matthew Siegal, Irah H. Donner

Upon issuance, can a later-issued (but earlier-expiring) patent qualify as a double patenting reference against an already issued (but later-expiring) commonly owned patent of the same inventor? In Gilead Sciences, the Federal Circuit held that it could.

Columns & Departments

Case Notes Image

Case Notes

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Analysis of a recent key case.

In the Courts Image

In the Courts

ljnstaff & Law Journal Newsletters

Discussion of the <I>Janus</I> Holding

Columns & Departments

Court Watch Image

Court Watch

Cynthia M. Klaus & Susan E. Tegt

Inconsistent Testimony Made Plaintiff Not Typical off Proposed Class <br>Franchisor Sanctioned For Failing to Prepare Its Representative for Corporate Deposition<br>Federal Court Enforces Franchisee Post-Termination Obligations

Features

Intent to Use Image

Intent to Use

Ed Komen

Bona fide intent was given new meaning by the TTAB. <i>Lincoln National Corporation v. Anderson,</i> exemplifies an apparent trend of the TTAB requiring greater proof of an applicant's "intent" as a jurisdictional prerequisite for filing an application or face a finding that the application is void <i>ab initio.</i> This is the paradigm of the "ticking time bomb" trademark nightmare with a very long fuse.

Features

The 'Going and Coming' Rule Image

The 'Going and Coming' Rule

Michael Resis

Although the "traveling employee" exception to the "going and coming rule" is strictly limited to workers' compensation cases, it has been widely applied to many cases that the exception has evolved into its own rule.

Features

The Fifth Circuit Takes On the Issue of Prepayment Premiums Image

The Fifth Circuit Takes On the Issue of Prepayment Premiums

Brett D. Goodman

In a recent decision by the Fifth Circuit, the court held that a lender's pre-bankruptcy acceleration of a promissory note arising from a borrower's nonpayment default did not trigger provision for a prepayment premium in the absence of an actual loan prepayment.

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel
    'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.
    Read More ›
  • Holders of Unredeemed Gift Cards Denied Bankpruptcy Priority
    For some time now, the brick and mortar side of the retail industry has been in financial distress. In 2015 and 2016 alone, brand-name ­companies such as Sports Authority, RadioShack, Aéropostale, American Apparel, Eastern Mountain Sports and City Sports sought bankruptcy protection. A common question in these cases is how to treat holders of unredeemed gift cards. Are they near the back of the line with other general unsecured creditors, or are they entitled to “priority” payment status under the Bankruptcy Code?
    Read More ›