Patent Litigation

  • The Supreme Court sparked a seismic shift in patent litigation recently when it upset the long-standing interpretation of 28 U.S.C. §1400(b), the special patent venue statute. TC Heartland held that for the purposes of patent venue, the meaning of "resides" in Section 1400(b) is not supplemented by the broad definition of "resides" in the general venue provision, 28 U.S.C. §1391.

    August 01, 2017J. Alexander Lawrence
  • Supreme Court Turns Back Clock

    Although TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods answers the question of where a domestic corporation resides in patent infringement cases, it does not fully answer the question of where proper venue lies.

    July 02, 2017Christopher Gaspar and Sean Hyberg
  • Federal Circuit Affirms Non-Infringement Decision Based on Prosecution Disclaimer
    Federal Circuit Decisions Offer Guidance on Award of Attorney Fees under Section 285

    July 02, 2017Jeff Ginsberg and David Cooperberg
  • PTAB Did Not Deny Procedural Due Process By Adopting a Claim Construction not Offered by the Parties During IPR
    USPTO Did Not Exceed Authority in Granting Inter Partes Reexamination after Requester Sought to Have It Denied

    June 02, 2017Howard J. Shire and Michael Block