Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Search


Web Posts Versus the First Amendment
July 31, 2006
The filing of a defamation lawsuit against the owner and operator of an Internet forum is raising questions about First Amendment rights versus the right to privacy.<br>Pittsburgh attorney Todd Hollis filed a lawsuit in Pennsylvania state court, alleging his reputation is being harmed by comments posted by purported ex-girlfriends on the Web site dontdatehimgirl.com.
Thompson Memorandum on Fees Found Unconstitutional
July 31, 2006
Strong words: KPMG refused to pay its employees' legal fees because prosecutors held a 'gun to its head,' and the government thus 'violated the Constitution it is sworn to defend.' This statement from U.S District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan in the KPMG tax shelter case has shaken the foundations of corporate prosecutorial policy. <i>United States v. Stein et al.</i>, 2006 WL 1735260, (S.D.N.Y. June 26, 2006).
August issue in PDF format
July 31, 2006
&#133;
Efficient Training on Specific IP Issues
July 31, 2006
An excellent time to provide training to a client organization is when the client asks for guidance on IP strategy. In many cases, a client develops an IP strategy due to the desire to approach a specific business need in a planned and proactive manner. This specific business need can be, for example, a new invention, a new competitor, or a new development with another company.
Buyer Beware: When 'All Rights' Doesn't Mean What You Think
July 31, 2006
When drafting an assignment or litigating a case for a client who owns a patent by way of an assignment, many lawyers assume that an assignment giving the assignee 'all rights, title, and interest' allows the client to completely step into the shoes of the assignor. A patent assignment that purports to convey 'all rights' of the assignor, however, does not convey the right to sue for past infringement without an express provision granting the assignee this right.
Small Entity Status: Potential Pitfalls and Curative Measures
July 31, 2006
In 1980, Congress amended the patent code to require patent owners to pay periodic maintenance fees in order to keep their patents in force. In response to concerns about the financial impact on individual inventors and small businesses, a 'small entity' category was added to the law to permit certain individuals, nonprofit organizations, and small businesses to pay half of most normal U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ('PTO') fees.
e-Commerce Docket Sheet
July 31, 2006
Recent cases in e-commerce law and in the e-commerce industry.
New Kinds of e-Commerce
July 31, 2006
As more people live in the virtual world ' sometimes also called the digital or synthetic world ' in one of the many so-called massively multiplayer online role-playing games (MMPORGs) available online, the potential for monetary abuse and malfeasance grows.
Europe's Reaction Against the SOX Anonymous Whistleblowing Rule
July 31, 2006
The audience of multinational corporations required to comply with SOX and EU data-protection laws ' whether in e-commerce or bricks-and-mortar operations ' can only watch, do their best to implement anonymous whistleblower mechanisms in compliance with both SOX and EU privacy law, and wait until the contest is decided.
Overseas Court Decisions Limit U.S. Internet Speech
July 31, 2006
Australian, English and Canadian court rulings associated with defamatory Internet communications emanating from the United States may limit American speech, a specter that stands to cast a long, haunting shadow over a range of U.S.-based activities, from publishing to online auctions to discussion and criticism.<br>For jurisdictional purposes, Internet publications may be subject to worldwide legal difficulties. Using common law theory, foreign courts have found American Internet publishers liable for harm to readers located in foreign jurisdictions, and have subjected those publishers to foreign-liability law, even though American law holds the sender immune from liability.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • The Article 8 Opt In
    The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
    Read More ›
  • Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
    With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
    Read More ›
  • Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
    This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
    Read More ›
  • "Holy Fair Use, Batman": Copyright, Fair Use and the Dark Knight
    The copyright for the original versions of Winnie the Pooh and Mickey Mouse have expired. Now, members of the public can create — and are busy creating — their own works based on these beloved characters. Suppose, though, we want to tell stories using Batman for which the copyright does not expire until 2035. We'll review five hypothetical works inspired by the original Batman comic and analyze them under fair use.
    Read More ›