Derivative Suits: Recent Developments
Numerous studies and articles document the alarming increase during the last few years in the size of settlements in securities class action lawsuits. As a result, directors, officers, insurers, brokers, and others focus almost exclusively on securities class actions when evaluating risks and structuring D&O insurance programs. Although largely ignored in that analysis, shareholder derivative lawsuits are also very important liability exposures particularly for directors since directors are named as defendants in derivative suits far more frequently than in securities class actions and since settlements and judgments in derivative suits are usually not indemnifiable by the company.
Ad Hoc Affirmative Action
Unfortunately, attempting to achieve the worthy goal of increasing workplace diversity through ad hoc decisions that advance women or minorities, often made in the absence of, or without strict adherence to, a formal affirmative action plan, can spawn claims of illegal reverse discrimination. Such claims appear to be on the rise.
The Tarnished Parachute
As American companies struggle to compete in a global market, they are increasingly considering the merits of eliminating or reducing costly retiree benefits. For many companies, the costs of these benefits have become staggering. For example, before recently announcing plans to freeze health benefits for tens of thousands of its white-collar retirees, Ford Motor Co. was facing health-care expenses of more than $3.5 billion. Its rival, General Motors, which according to recent reports owes a projected $89 billion in welfare and pension benefits to its current and future retirees, just announced that it will offer workers with 10 years' experience a payment of $140,000 and a pension, if in return these workers will leave their employment and forgo health care benefits.
Employee Handbooks
Employee handbooks can be an essential tool for communicating company policies and procedures to employees of any type of enterprise.
The 10 Bits Of Legal Advice Every Tech Client Should Get ' On Day One
You've seen it so many times: New tech clients have great dreams. They're always sure that their invention will make millions, as soon as you, their attorney, introduce them to people who can provide the funding that will develop, market and advertise the invention.<br>Counsel, unfortunately, must play their role, and discharge their responsibilities, and end these dreams with a splash of reality. This is the way of the world: While some startup firms will taste success, most, for a host of reasons that fit each company according to the company's situation, will not. <br>So as a new client sits across your desk, what advice must you give? Below is my take on the e-commerce advice that counsel must dispense, whether or not the client wants to hear it ' including how to work best with counsel to get results at a reasonable cost.
Antitrust Liability For Joint Ventures
The term 'joint venture' encompasses a wide range of business combinations, some of which are simply contractual agreements between independent parties, others of which involve the creation of new entities through consolidation, and some of which involve both integration and contractual agreements. Because joint ventures comprise such a diverse array of business structures, they often defy easy characterization for antitrust purposes: Is a venture best viewed as a merger? A price-fixing agreement? Something in between? This characterization problem contributed to significant confusion in the courts over the proper scope of antitrust liability for joint ventures. <br>At one time, courts routinely declared unlawful a variety of joint ventures, many of which were plainly pro-competitive. The Supreme Court's decision in <i>Texaco, Inc. v. Dagher</i>, clarifies the application of the antitrust laws to joint ventures, and narrows the scope of potential liability for these types of business combinations.
The Absolute Priority Rule
Debtors in bankruptcy cases have long sought to make distributions to old equity without running afoul of the absolute priority rule. Time and again, debtors' efforts to leave old equity with value in a reorganized entity have been challenged in the appellate courts, and often in the Supreme Court. A proposed distribution to old equity in the complex Armstrong World Industries (AWI) case was struck down recently by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Court. <i>In re Armstrong World Indus., Inc.</i>, 432 F.3d 507 (3rd Cir. 2005).
What Do You Want To Read?
We want to know how we can make this newsletter an even better resource for your professional needs. Are we covering all you want to see? Are there sections you would like to see enhanced or replaced?<br>Your views and opinions are essential in our effort to continue to provide you with the top notch News, Strategy and Analysis you have come to expect from Law Journal Newsletters.<br>Help us help you! Please click <a href="http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=604771980045">here</a> to complete a short survey or type the following URL into your browser: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=604771980045.<br>Your answers will assist us in making this an even better newsletter for you! Thank you.<br>Regards,<br>Colin Graf<br>LJN Marketing Director
What Every U.S. Employer Should Know About Workplace Privacy
The U.S. privacy arena is a minefield for employers. The United States has no omnibus employee privacy law. Instead, employers are faced with a patchwork of privacy laws that they must piece together to avoid legal liability. This article focuses on the key privacy issues employers in the U.S. must confront.
Case Notes
Recent rulings of interest to you and your practice.
