Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Locks, the saying goes, keep honest people honest. Good physical security will keep out the curious passer-by or casual miscreant, but no lock is perfect and the determined thief will always find a way in. In recent years, it has become obvious that the same is true of the Internet. As a practical matter, no connected computer system is impenetrable, and password surveys routinely show that most people don't even have decent locks on their doors. Yet individuals and businesses place vast amounts of crucial, sensitive information online, assuming that it will remain secure. And when the locks fail, they turn to the law.
There are, of course, a number of legal protections against the misappropriation and misuse of personal data, identity or intellectual property. They include federal and state statutes, as well as common law claims of misappropriation, unfair competition and breach of duty, to name a few. But the great majority of those protections focus on the information that's taken, not the act of taking it. In the electronic universe, the damage from an intrusion often includes not only the loss of data, but the costly disruption to the system itself. There is no physical analog to that harm. A burglary victim is concerned about the assets in the safe, not the damage to the safe itself. But online, the calculation may be different: The “safe” is often a computer system or network that is vital to the victim's personal or business livelihood. When dealing with computer intrusions, the law has to address that potential loss as well.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.