Follow Us
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In Bank of America v. City of Miami, 2017 WL 1540509, the United States Supreme Court faced a claim by the City of Miami that two banks had violated the federal Fair Housing Act by issuing loans to black and Latino customers on terms less favorable than loans issued to similarly situated customers who were white and non-Latino. The Court’s decision represented a partial victory for each side: It held that the City had standing to bring the claim, but imposed on the City a burden to prove that any violation constituted the proximate cause of the City’s harm.
*May exclude premium content
Owners Have No Constitutional Right to Expand Nonconforming Uses
By Stewart E. Sterk
Can a municipality’s refusal to permit expansion of a pre-existing nonconforming use constitute a federal constitutional violation?
By NYRE Staff
When Zoning Amendment Adds Permitted Uses In Zoning District, Landowners Subject to the Ordinance Have Standing to Challenge the Amendment
By NYRE Staff
Unit Owner’s BCL 501(c) Claim Dismissed
By NYRE Staff
Local Law Prohibiting No-Cause Evictions Pre-Empted By State Law
Contractual Indemnification Unenforceable
Indemnification Clause Enforced
Good Faith Efforts to Cure Extend Cure Period for Yellowstone Injunction
Copyright © ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
