Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On April 1, 2019, a Federal Circuit panel consisting of Judge Lourie, Judge Moore and Judge Wallach issued a unanimous, nonprecedential opinion, authored by Judge Lourie, in Cleveland Clinic Found. v. True Health Diagnostics LLC, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 9451 (Fed. Cir. 2019). Cleveland Clinic Foundation and Cleveland Heartlab, Inc. (together, Cleveland) appealed the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia's decision that the claims at issue were directed to patent-ineligible subject matter. Because the district court correctly concluded that the claims are directed to a natural law and recite no other inventive concept, the panel affirmed.
Cleveland sued True Health Diagnostics LLC (True Health) for infringement of two related patents, asserting claims that are directed to methods of detecting an elevated myeloperoxidase (MPO) concentration in a plasma sample from a human subject with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ACVD). Slip Op. at 6-7. In granting True Health's Rule 12(b)(6) motion, the district court found the asserted claims patent-ineligible as directed to a natural law under 35 U.S.C. §101 and dismissed Cleveland's complaint for failure to state a claim. Slip Op. at 7.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.