Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When a landowner contends that government action has effected a taking of her property without just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, where can she sue? Until this past June, when the U.S. Supreme Court decided Knick v. Township of Scott, 139 S. Ct. 2162 (June 2019), the answer was clear: state court and only state court. Knick changed all that. The Court overruled Williamson County v. Hamilton Bank, 473 U. S. 172 and held that a landowner who claimed to have suffered a taking at the hands of state or local officials could seek redress in federal court without the need to first seek compensation through state proceedings. The Court’s holding may channel more takings cases into federal courts, but leaves those courts with some unresolved questions.
*May exclude premium content
By Eamon P. Joyce and Cassandra Liu
This article focuses on a recent decision upholding a pipeline developer’s exercise of eminent domain under New York law in National Fuel Gas Supply Corp. v. Schueckler.
Condemnee Entitled to Consequential Damages To Contiguous Parcel
Valuation for Prospective Use Rejected
Statute of Frauds Bars Lease Claim
Buildings Constitute Horizontal Multiple Dwelling
No Agreement to Renew
No Wrongful Eviction When Subtenant Remains On Premises
Alleged Title Defect Did Not Excuse Failure to Close
Statute of Limitations Bars Foreclosure Claim
Statute of Limitations Did Not Extinguish Mortgage