Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In Energy Heating, LLC v. Heat On-The-Fly, LLC, 15 F.4th 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2021), the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court of North Dakota's finding that the case was exceptional and that the court may award reasonable attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. §285. The court found that the patent owner was granted its patent due to inequitable conduct for intentionally failing to disclose prior sales and unreasonably pursuing litigation with a fraudulently obtained patent.
In the case, Heat On-The-Fly, LLC (HOTF) owned U.S. Patent No. 8,171,993 (the '993 Patent) for a method of fracking. Energy Heating LLC (Energy) sought a declaratory judgment of noninfringement, invalidity, and unenforceability due to inequitable conduct. The district court agreed with Energy's inequitable conduct argument and found the patent unenforceable. Specifically, the district court found inequitable conduct because Energy established through clear and convincing evidence that HOTF deliberately withheld "substantial on-sale and public uses of the claimed invention" more than a year before the patent's priority date to the USPTO. Additionally, the district court found an intent to deceive USPTO. Accordingly, the court reasoned that a reasonable person who withholds information regarding on-sale and public uses to obtain a patent is also aware that the patent, if granted, is invalid.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.