Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When, at the culmination of environmental review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), a municipality resolves to require a developer to ameliorate environmental impacts, can anyone other than the municipality itself enforce the requirement? Most SEQRA cases involve attacks on an agency's compliance with SEQRA procedures, but in Mutual Aid Association v. City of Yonkers, NYLJ 11/15/21, p. 21, the Second Department faced a challenge to the municipality's follow through long after the SEQRA review was completed. Because the court resolved the case by concluding that the municipality had not, in fact, imposed a requirement on the developer, the court avoided the more basic question: can a municipality or other lead agency impose a requirement and then decide not to enforce it.
The case involves obligations supposedly imposed on the developer of Ridge Hill, an 81-acre mixed use residential and commercial development in the City of Yonkers. In 2003, the developer sought zoning amendments and site plan approval to allow the project to go forward. The developer's Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) concluded that to mitigate the project's impact on fire protection, "the Yonkers Fire Department may need to increase its current staffing and equipment as well as consider the construction of a new fire station." The Yonkers City Council accepted a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) in May, 2005. After public hearings and public comments, the Council, in December 2005, adopted a Statement of Findings indicating that the impact on fire protection "will be accomplished by improvements to the infrastructure and the addition of new fire fighting and supervisory personnel." Seven months later, the council adopted another resolution with a supplemental findings statement, which included the following language:
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.