Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Sept. 15, 2023, a Federal Circuit panel including Judges Prost, Reyna, and Hughes issued a unanimous decision in Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. v. Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc., Case Nos. 2021-2299, 2021-2338 (Fed. Cir. 2023). The Federal Circuit vacated the jury's finding of non-infringement of U.S. Design Patent No. D657,093 ("the D'093 patent") and remanded for further proceedings. Slip op. at 2.
Plaintiff Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. (Columbia) accused Defendant Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. (Seirus) of infringing the D'093 patent, which claims the "ornamental design of a heat reflective material." Id. The district court initially granted Columbia's motion for summary judgment of infringement of the D'093 patent. In doing so, the district court rejected Seirus's argument that its logo within the design of the material "made that design different enough from the claimed design" to preclude infringement. Id. at 5. The district court also "disregarded the Seirus logo altogether in its infringement analysis." Id. The district court further found that the "comparison prior art" was "far afield" from the D'093 patent and was therefore not "relevant comparison prior art." Id.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.