Follow Us

Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Regulation United States Supreme Court White Collar Crime

Supreme Court Set to Decide On Competing Interpretations of Federal Corruption Statute

In this article, we describe the competing interpretations of Section 666 and comment on the implications of a Supreme Court decision in United States v. Snyder, where it will decide whether the law criminalizes “gratuities,” and not simply “bribes,” given to state and local officials.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Section 666 of Title 18 has become one of the most important legal tools used in the federal prosecution of state and local corruption. The law applies broadly to public and private organizations funded by the federal government and makes it a crime to “corruptly solicit[ ][,] demand[ ][,] … or accept[ ] … anything of value” with the “inten[t] to be influenced or rewarded in connection with” an organization’s activities. 18 U.S.C. §666(a)(1)(B).

This premium content is locked for Business Crimes Bulletin subscribers only

Continue reading by getting
started with a subscription.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS FOR WHITE-COLLAR CRIME AND REGULATORY PRACTITIONERS.
  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • All aspects of financial and white-collar crime are covered
  • Tap into expert guidance from top white-collar crime adn regulatory lawyers and experts

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Subscribe Now For Unlimited Access

Read These Next