Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Section 43(a)(1)(B) of the Lanham Act provides a cause of action based on false advertising when, "in commercial advertising or promotion, [the defendant] misrepresents the nature, characteristics, qualities, or geographic origin of his or her or another person's goods, services, or commercial activities." 15 U.S.C. §1125(a)(1)(B). In Crocs, Inc. v. Effervescent, Inc., the Federal Circuit considered whether such a cause of action exists when a party falsely claims that a feature of its product is patented. See, No. 2022-2160, 2024 WL 4376134, at *1-2 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 3, 2024). The court found that it does.
In particular, the website of counterclaim-defendant Crocs, Inc. (Crocs) was alleged to have falsely described "Croslite" material used in Crocs footwear products as "patented," "proprietary," and "exclusive." Id. at *1. Crocs moved for summary judgment, arguing that this claim was "legally barred" by two prior decisions, Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003), and Baden Sports, Inc. v. Molten USA, Inc., 556 F.3d 1300 (Fed. Cir. 2009). The district court agreed and granted Crocs's motion, holding that "the terms 'patented,' 'proprietary,' and 'exclusive' were claims of 'inventorship'" akin to a "false designation of authorship" (as in Dastar and Molten), not misrepresentations as to "the nature, characteristics, or qualities of Crocs' products" (as required by the Lanham Act). See, id.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.