Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Massachusetts Issues Landmark Ruling

Shari A. Levitan & Ellen Schiffer Berkowitz

November 18, 2003: In a decision sure to affect other states, the Massachusetts Judicial Supreme Court has ruled that banning gay and lesbian marriages is unconstitutional.

Features

Index

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

A complete listing of all cases discussed in this issue.

Features

Quiz of the Month

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Test your knowledge of the law!

Features

New Protected Activity ' Displaying the Flag

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

The realm of protected activity has been expanded by the New York Legislature to include the display of the American flag by an employee on that employee's person or in his/her workstation.

Features

John Gaal's Ethics Corner

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Your ethics questions answered by the expert.

Features

Decisions of Interest

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Recent rulings of interest to your practice.

UK Announces Labeling Guides

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

New guidelines for the design of drug labeling and packaging were announced March 3 by Britain's Health minister, Lord Philip Hunt.

Features

Index

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

A complete listing of all cases discussed in this issue.

Decisions of Interest

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Recent decisions of importance to your practice.

Features

Quiz of the Month

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Test your knowledge of the law!

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Surveys in Patent Infringement Litigation: The Next Frontier
    Most experienced intellectual property attorneys understand the significant role surveys play in trademark infringement and other Lanham Act cases, but relatively few are likely to have considered the use of such research in patent infringement matters. That could soon change in light of the recent admission of a survey into evidence in <i>Applera Corporation, et al. v. MJ Research, Inc., et al.</i>, No. 3:98cv1201 (D. Conn. Aug. 26, 2005). The survey evidence, which showed that 96% of the defendant's customers used its products to perform a patented process, was admitted as evidence in support of a claim of inducement to infringe. The court admitted the survey into evidence over various objections by the defendant, who had argued that the inducement claim could not be proven without the survey.
    Read More ›