Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
IP News
Article III Inter Partes Review Decision Precluded By Congress, SCOTUS Rules
In Thryv, Inc. v. Click-to-Call Techs., L.P., No. 18-916, 2020 U.S.P.Q.2d 10373 (Apr. 20, 2020), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Congress precluded Article III judicial review of a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision to institute inter partes review (IPR), even if such a decision may have been made erroneously. The Court found that 35 U.S.C. §315(b)'s time bar cannot be reviewed by a federal court. No. 18-916 (Apr. 20, 2020). Justice Ginsberg penned the 7-2 majority opinion, finding that the decision in Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC v. Lee, 136 S. Ct. 2131 (2016), controlled.
In 2001, Inforocket.com sued Keen, Inc. for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,818,836 (the '836 Patent). Subsequently Keen, Inc. acquired Inforocket.com, and, as part of the merger, the parties dismissed the suit without prejudice in 2003. Keen, Inc. went through a series of mergers, acquisitions, and name changes from 2003 to 2019 and is now named Thryv, Inc. While the mergers and acquisitions were ongoing, the '836 Patent was assigned to Click-to-Call Technologies, L.P. and was asserted against various defendants. Thryv, the owner of the '836 Patent in another life, found itself as one of the defendants accused of infringing the same. See generally, Click-To-Call Techs., L.P. v. Ingenio, Inc., 899 F.3d 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2018).
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.